|
Is the use of deity-forms (idols) a legitimate method of
worship?
Important note: worshippers who
use deity-forms as objects of devotion normally do not describe this
practice as idolatry. I would ask such persons to tolerate my use of the
term and seriously consider my arguments against this religious tradition.
What is idolatry? Basically it means ascribing divinity
and granting worship to something created: either created by God or
fashioned by man. It is usually an attempt on the part of human beings to
relate to the infinite, invisible God by identifying him with something
finite and visible. Often this involves some kind of statue, image or
picture representing a being thought to be divine.
In the broadest sense, the term "idolatry" can
be divided into at least eleven categories: (1) Worship of inanimate objects
like stones, mountains, or rivers; (2) Worship of animate things such as
animals, trees or plants; (3) Worship of heavenly bodies like the sun, moon
or stars; (4) Worship of the forces of nature like wind, rain or fire; (5)
Worship of deceased ancestors; (6) Worship of humanly-authored, mythological
deities by means of pictures, statues or images; (7) Worship of angels,
demons or spirit-beings of any kind; (8) Worship of a process of life,
specifically sexual reproduction; (9) Worship of any ordinary human being
who claims to be divine; (10) Worship of an ideal or some philosophical view
instead of the Creator; (11) Allowing anything other than God to become the
highest priority of life, demanding one's full devotion and attention.
Several of the main living religions prohibit idolatry
altogether—Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Hinduism encourages and
cultivates this custom. Three primary Far Eastern religions—Buddhism,
Sikhism and Jainism—began as reform movements teaching against the
idolatry so prevalent in the predominantly Hindu culture of the day (though
Jainism and certain Buddhist sects now promote the use of idols).
The Hindu people as a whole are probably some of the most
intensely religious people in the world. (I have grown to respect and love
them deeply for this.) In India and other areas with a large Hindu populace,
idolatry abounds. Many shrines, both large and small, house pictures and
images adoringly viewed by a daily stream of worshippers. Often the gods
portrayed in pictures or statuary are shown to have multiple human parts
(four heads, six hands, etc.) or they bear an animal-like resemblance.
Consider the popular Hindu god, Hanuman, who has the appearance of a monkey,
or Ganesha, who has the head of an elephant, but the body of a human. At
Hindu temples and private altars in homes, idol-gods are sometimes bathed,
dressed, adorned with jewelry and flowers, 'fed' and even tucked into
bed at night.
Though many educated Hindus do not participate in these
traditions, they usually react with kindness and tolerance. According to the
Far Eastern worldview, every expression of worship, no matter how primitive,
is a steppingstone toward Ultimate Reality. The Hindu mystic Ramakrishna
explained this perspective with the following analogy: "We see little
girls with their dolls, but how long do they play with them? Only so long as
they are not married…Similarly, one needs images and symbols so long as
God is not realized in his true form. It is God himself who has provided
these various forms of worship…to suit…different stages of spiritual
growth and knowledge."1 Even though
more mature teachers of Far Eastern doctrine admit idolatry is an inferior
approach based on myths and false assumptions, yet they infer that it is an
elementary step in the right direction. The stories of the activities of the
Hindu gods may be fictitious, but on the level of the common people, they
illustrate valuable spiritual truths.
Again, I must admit that I admire the spiritual passion
that dominates the Hindu culture. Their evident hunger for spiritual
realities has warmed my heart every time I have visited the land of India.
In some ways it exceeds that which I have witnessed in a predominantly
materialistic, and often hedonistic Western world. Yet, as I have said
before, sincerity is not always an indication of veracity. Should idols be
used in worship? Let me answer that question with a series of questions
especially directed toward those religious leaders who promote the practice
of idolatry, though they recognize its falseness:
Is it not unethical to promote something that is
spiritually false as if it were absolutely true and valid? Does this
not constitute a spiritual kind of coercion, a manipulation of the
simpleminded multitudes who unquestionably believe? Moreover, how can
false methods in seeking God, and false interpretations of the nature
of God, ever lead to a true understanding of his attributes?
Directly opposite to any tolerant view is the strong and
unmistakable mandate spoken by the personal God of Judaism from the top of
Mount Sinai. The thunderclap of his voice declared, "You shall have no
other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of
anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters
below." (Exodus 20:3–4 NIV) Such a blunt, divine edict leaves
no room for discussion. God was very plain in instructing his people never
to participate in this method of worship. He never said, "It may be
wrong, but it is a step in the right direction, so I will allow it for a
season."
Isaiah, God's prophet to the Jews, urged his listeners
to be awakened to the falsehood of this practice. He revealed, "they
have no knowledge, who carry the wood of their carved image, and pray to a
god that cannot save." (Isaiah 45:20) A god who cannot hear, see
or walk cannot intervene in the lives of 'his' or 'her' devotees.
Of course, most advocates of this practice would argue
that the inanimate idol is only a crude representation of an existent
spiritual entity, a literal god. The idol, though lifeless, is actually
inhabited by the spirit of a god who IS alive and who CAN hear, see and
walk. Just suppose, though—if a particular god is the product of human
imagination and doesn't actually exist—and if there is a spirit
inhabiting a wood, stone or metal image of that god—what kind of spirit is
it? The New Testament writer, Paul, explained that these spirit-beings are
actually demons impersonating those 'gods' being sought. This was one of
the main reasons he commanded Christians to "flee from idolatry." (1
Corinthians 10:14, 20)
Such prohibition of idolatry makes many customs and
traditions in Far Eastern religious groups unacceptable to a Christian who
embraces the biblical worldview. A good example is the initiation ceremony
for those making a commitment to practice TM (Transcendental Meditation—the
organization founded by Maharishi Mahesh Yogi). The opening ceremony of
worship, called a puja, involves a Hindu hymn being sung before a
picture of Maharishi's mentor, Guru Dev. The favor and presence of the
Hindu gods are invoked and various offerings, including fruits and flowers,
are presented to Guru Dev, celebrating his revered status in the spiritual
lineage of this movement. The final prayer begins with a statement of faith
concerning this world-famous promoter of TM:
"Guru in the glory of Brahma, guru in the
glory of Vishnu, guru in the glory of the great Lord Shiva, guru in
the glory of personified transcendental fullness of Brahman, to him
Shri Guru Dev, adorned with glory, I bow down."
Advocates of Transcendental Meditation do not consider
Guru Dev an Avatar. In Far Eastern religions, though, each person is said to
possess a divine essence, so such worshipful actions toward a human being
would not be considered wrong. This is not acceptable for a Christian,
especially considering the invocation of those Hindu gods who according to
the Bible are false gods and do not exist. (See Acts 14:1–18.)
1 The World's Great Religions (New York: Time
Incorporated, 1957) p. 16.
|